Search results
4 results
Sort by:
November 1, 2011Akash D. Sethi, Derrick Carson, Brad L. Whitlock
Boilerplate Provisions
Black’s Law Dictionary defines “Boilerplate” as: “Language which is used commonlyin documents having the same meaning; used to describe standard language in a legal document that is identical in instruments of a like nature.” Boilerplate language certainly serves apurpose to reduce transaction costs and avoid protracted negotiation over what, in many instances, are standard terms. But, too often, lawyers rely on this common usage of the term“boilerplate” when examining, or rather glossing over, relatively customary contractual provisions such as recitals, statements of consideration, and the ever-dangerous miscellaneous section. Like other contractual provisions, mere reliance on form boilerplate provisions can yieldunintended and often unfavorable results. Therefore, attorneys are cautioned to review theseprovisions with the same care as they would review the remaining terms of a given contract.
March 3, 2022Byron F. Egan
Reliance Disclaimers in M&A Agreements
Buying or selling a closely held business (“M&A), including the purchase of a division or a subsidiary, can be structured as (i) a statutory combination such as a statutory merger or share exchange, (ii) a negotiated purchase of outstanding stock from existing shareholders or (iii) a purchase of assets from the business.1 An M&A transaction typically revolves around an agreement between the buyer and the selling entity, and sometimes its owners, setting forth the terms of the deal, which is herein referred to as the “Agreement” whether it takes the form of a merger agreement, stock purchase agreement or asset purchase agreement. An M&A Agreement typically includes contractual representations and warranties as to the assets and liabilities of the business to be acquired, conditions to the buyer’s obligations to close the transaction contemplated thereby, the obligations of the seller and its owners to indemnify the buyer for breaches of its representations and covenants therein (and any contractual limitations on the amount that buyer can recover for such breaches), and that the Agreement represents the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the transaction. After the transaction is closed, the buyer may determine that there were breaches of seller’s representations and covenants, and that buyer’s losses could exceed the amount that buyer could recover under the express indemnification provisions in the Agreement. Under these circumstances, the buyer might claim that is was defrauded by the seller, that its damages for its fraud claim were not capped by the Agreement, and that it is entitled to rescind the transactions and recover the amount that it paid for the business. Whether the buyer is entitled to recover the amount it seeks depends on the wording of the Agreement and the law governing its rights under the Agreement.
March 15, 2013Akash D. Sethi, Derrick Carson, Brad L. Whitlock
Boilerplate Provisions
Black’s Law Dictionary defines “Boilerplate” as: “Language which is used commonly in documents having the same meaning; used to describe standard language in a legal document that is identical in instruments of a like nature.”1 Boilerplate language certainly serves a purpose to reduce transaction costs and avoid protracted negotiation over what, in many instances, are standard terms. But, too often, lawyers rely on this common usage of the term “boilerplate” when examining, or rather glossing over, relatively customary contractual provisions such as recitals, statements of consideration, and the ever-dangerous miscellaneous section. Like other contractual provisions, mere reliance on form boilerplate provisions can yield unintended and often unfavorable results. Therefore, attorneys are cautioned to review these provisions with the same care as they would review the remaining terms of a given contract.
October 23, 2009David E. Harrell Jr.
Developing Alternative Dispute Resolution Programs
This paper will provide an overview of the law of arbitration and identify some considerations for attorneys who counsel clients about whether arbitration might be an appropriate dispute resolution vehicle for their relationship and how to shape their arbitration framework.